What interview format provides a benchmark for evaluating the consistency of applicants' responses?

The benchmark for evaluating the consistency of applicants' responses is best provided by a structured interview. This format is designed with a predefined set of questions that are asked in the same way to every candidate. By utilizing the same questions, structured interviews facilitate a consistent comparison of each applicant's responses, enabling the interviewer to better assess and evaluate their qualifications and fit for the position.

Structured interviews are known for enhancing fairness and reducing bias since each candidate is evaluated based on the same criteria. This systematic approach allows for a more objective analysis of how each applicant aligns with the required skills and competencies for the role.

The other interview formats, such as situational and competency interviews, while useful in extracting specific information or assessing particular skills, do not inherently provide the same level of consistency in question delivery and response evaluation as structured interviews do. Stress interviews, which aim to elicit how candidates react under pressure, also fall short in systematic comparison since they focus more on the individual's reaction rather than standardized responses.